Experts and scholars interpret the Sino-US high-level

From March 18th to 19th local time, the China-US high-level strategic dialogue was held in Anchorage. The two sides conducted candid and constructive exchanges on their respective domestic and foreign policies, bilateral relations, and major international and regional issues of common concern. Experts and scholars believe that at an important juncture in the development of Sino-US relations, this is a concrete measure for the two sides to implement the consensus on the call between the two heads of state. The strengthening of communication, exchanges and dialogue between China and the United States in various fields is conducive to strengthening strategic communication, promoting mutually beneficial cooperation, properly managing differences, and promoting the development of bilateral relations along a healthy and stable track Spark Global Limited.

Implement the consensus of the head of state, release a positive signal

On the morning of Chinese New Year’s Eve on February 11, the heads of state of China and the United States had a phone call. The Chinese side stated that the two countries should work together and meet each other halfway, uphold the spirit of non-conflict, non-confrontation, mutual respect, and win-win cooperation, focus on cooperation, manage differences, and promote the healthy and stable development of Sino-US relations. The US expressed its willingness to conduct candid and constructive dialogues with China in the spirit of mutual respect to enhance mutual understanding and avoid misunderstanding and misjudgment. The two sides agreed to maintain close contact on Sino-US relations and issues of common concern.

“The strategic guidance of the two heads of state is very important.” Wang Fan, deputy dean of the China Foreign Affairs University, said that the China-US high-level strategic dialogue is an important measure to implement the consensus of the two heads of state. Although there were some episodes at the beginning of the dialogue because the US did not conform to diplomatic etiquette, on the whole, the exchanges in this strategic dialogue were rational and smooth, and achieved the effect of communication. Dialogue is better than confrontation, and such dialogue itself can have a positive impact.

Ruan Zongze, executive vice president of the China Institute of International Studies, pointed out that China-US relations have encountered serious difficulties due to the wrong practices of the previous US administration, and the two sides have many issues that need to be communicated. The dialogue was timely, rich in content, and full of time. Through dialogue, the two sides have enhanced mutual understanding and confirmed areas for cooperation. For example, the two sides will establish a Sino-US joint working group on climate change. Both parties expressed their hope to continue this high-level strategic communication, which is also a positive sign.

Professor Wang Dong of the School of International Relations at Peking University said that this dialogue is the first face-to-face strategic dialogue between China and the United States since the Biden administration took office. The two sides expounded their respective positions in the dialogue, and there were exchanges and confrontations. In particular, the Chinese side expounded its solemn position to get rid of the arrogance of the United States at the beginning. The two sides deepened their understanding through dialogue, and the dialogue was constructive.

Brighten principled positions to reduce strategic misjudgments

In this dialogue, the Chinese side emphasized that the ruling position of the Communist Party of China is a choice of history and the people’s choice; China firmly defends national sovereignty and national dignity, and firmly opposes other countries’ pointing fingers on China’s internal affairs; the essence of Sino-US relations is mutual benefit and mutual benefit. Win instead of a zero-sum game. China urges the United States to eliminate the influence of the previous government’s wrong policy toward China, and at the same time avoid creating new problems.